Emotional Value vs. Legal Value
The decision provoked dismay among animal rights advocates and Ortiz’s lawyer, Carlos Villacorta, who told AFP he was “relatively disappointed.” He warned that for people whose dog is their only companion, the loss could trigger devastating psychological consequences—yet such suffering would never be fully compensated under this framework.
The court did acknowledge the EU’s commitment to animal welfare but concluded that this principle does not override air transport liability rules. As long as welfare standards are respected during transport, pets remain “baggage” for legal purposes.
What It Means for Travelers with Pets
For pet owners, this ruling is a stark reminder: if you want airlines to be fully liable for your animal in case of loss, injury, or death, you must make a special declaration of value at check-in—and pay the extra fee.
Without it, the law treats your beloved companion no differently than a missing suitcase.
Rejoignez la discussion
Partagez votre expérience sur cet article. Les commentaires se chargent à l'ouverture de la discussion.